Smuggling by False Statements and Documents in Iranian Criminal Law

Document Type : Scientific research

Author

• seyed mohamd mahdi sadati

Tehran University

https://doi.org/10.22067/le.v23i10.49388

Abstract

Smuggling in Iranian criminal law is infraction or economic crime. Smuggling by false statements and documents is a kind of smuggling crimes. Complexity of economic affairs, lack of legal analysis about the constituent elements of this crime and new adoption of these statues make analysis of this crime inevitable.
Smuggling is defined in law dictionary as: “import or export of goods illegally for example without paying customs” (Curzon, 2002: 392). Smuggling is a crime and in various statutes and bills in the Islamic Parliament such as the bill of “Establishment of Anti-corruption Agency” is named as “economic crimes”. One of the most important types of smuggling as discussed in this article is smuggling by false statements and documents. The main problem of this issue is the definition and the elements of forming this crime.
This crime does not fit the crime of smuggling in common definitions (Pazhooyan, 2006: 46/ Jafari Langroodi, 1998: 51) Because in this crime essentially a commodity may not enter or exit. So only offering and presentation of False Statements and Documents make the action of the person smuggling. On the other hand, definition of smuggling refers to the laws that in them some acts are considered smuggling or has the smuggling sentences, while the purpose of definition basically is to demystify the terms. So, in definition, the term should not refer to the laws.
According to the description above, the definition of this kind of smuggling is: “submitting false documents or declaration to customs on arrival or departure of the goods or vehicle, so that there is a possibility of harm to state.”
The legality of crime and punishments principle implies that actus reus and mens rea must be determined in statutes (Sadeghi, 2014: 57).
In Iranian law, smuggling by false statements and documents are criminalized in various laws: Paragraphs "a", "b", "c", "d", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g" of article 2 of the act of “combating smuggling of goods and exchanges”, articles 93 and 94 and paragraphs “a”, note of "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g" of article 113 of “customs act” and the article 24 of the “health promotion of administrative system and anti-corruption” act.
On the implementation of the act committed by legal provisions, first we must refer to “combating smuggling of goods and exchanges act”, since it is enacted earlier than other statutes. Then we recourse to the “customs act”. However, it should be noted that none of the customs act articles have explicitly or implicitly been abrogated by “combating smuggling of goods and exchanges act”. In the third level, if the act is not subject of the penalties set forth in one of these two laws, we must refer to the article 24 of the “health promotion of administrative system and anti-corruption Act”.
The actus reus of most crimes has three components: physical behavior set of conditions and circumstances and results. Physical behavior of this crime is a submission of the false documents, false declaration or non-declaration.
The criminal responsibility of who made omission is based on a duty to act, but he has not fulfilled its duty (Sadeghi, 2013: 31).
Among the conditions of this offense, four conditions are all important: First, the documents or statements must be false. The term “false” means contrary to the fact which may be in the material or content of the documents. Submission of false documents or declarations to the competent authorities (Ahmadi, 2012: 81) and being the subject of smuggling the goods or vehicle are the second and third terms. The possibility of harm to government revenues is the fourth condition in committing this crime.
This crime is a conduct crime and merely false declaration and submission of false documents may form this crime, whether the goods or vehicle exit from the customs organization or not. It is also sufficient to commit this crime by any mens rea and makes no difference whether the documents or statements are untrue deliberately or unintentionally. It is called “strict liability crimes” that some jurists believe that may happen without any men rea or fault (Goldouzian, 2007: 414/Sadeghi, 2014: 435).
Attempt to crime in smuggling by false statements or declarations are considerable, in spite of the view of some jurists (Noorbaha, 2005: 223/Ardabili, 2013: 316).
Methodology
This article by analytical method, on the basis of literal and conceptual interpretation of the articles of smuggling by false statements and documents in the various regulations, study the constituent elements of this crime. Also, domestic judicial decisions and legal practices in some countries are applied to explain this study more.
Results and Discussion
As a result, it is safe to say that the legal element of this crime sporadically are some articles in several regulations. This crime has strict liability and committed by action and omission. The false document or statement, its submission to authority, goods or vehicle issues and possibility of loss to the state are the terms that should be considered in formation of this crime. Strict liability of this crime makes demonstration of mens rea needless.

Keywords

• False statement
• Customs Crime
• Economic Crime
• Corruption
• Customs Smuggling

References

[1] (2012). Commercial Fraud Offences, Tehran: Mizan Publication. (In Persian)

[2] (2013). Offences against person, eleventh edition, Tehran: Mizan Publication. (In Persian)

[3] (2014). Offences against property, thirty-ninth editions, Tehran: Mizan Publication. (In Persian)

[4] Aghaie Nia, Hossein. (2011). Tehran University Course notes.

[5] Ahmadi, Abdullah. (2003). Smuggling, Tehran: Mizan Publication. (In Persian)

[6] Amid, Hasan. (1983). Persian dictionary, the eighteenth printing, Tehran, Amirkabir Publications. (In Persian)

[7] Ardabili, Mohammad Ali. (2013). General Criminal Law, vol. 1, thirty-third edition, Tehran: Mizan Publication. (In Persian)

[8] Attorney-General’s Department Staff. (1996). Australia, Customs Act 1901: Reprint, Issue11, Australian Government Pub. Service.

[9] Bezlov, Tihomir, Philip Gounev, Emil Tzenkov and Petkan lliev. (2004). Transportation, Smuggling, and Organized Crime, Sofia: Center for the Study of Democracy.

[10] Curzon, L.B. (2002). Dictionary of Law, Longman, six editions.

[11] Goldouzian, Iradj. (2007). Iranian general criminal law, Tenth Edition, Tehran: Tehran University Press. (In Persian)

[12] Jafari Langroodi, Mohammad Jafar. (1998). Law Terminology, tenth edition, Tehran: Ganje Danesh. (In Persian)

[13] Katouzian, Nasser. (2012). Introduction to the study of law and legal system of Iran, Tehran: Joint Stock Company publication. (In Persian)

[14] Moeen, Muhammad. (1996). Moeen Dictionary, Tehran: Amirkabir publication. (In Persian)

[15] Myers, M.B and Griffith, A.G. (1999). Strategies for combating gray market activity. Business horizons, volume 42, issue 6.

[16] Noorbaha, Reza. (2005). Introduction to the general criminal law, Thirteenth edition, Ganje Danesh publication. (In Persian)

[17] Pazhooyan, Jamshid., Maddah, Majid. (2006). Economic Analysis of smuggling in Iran, Economic Research Journal, No. 20. (In Persian)

[18] Sadeghi, H.M.M. (2013). Offences against the security of The State and Public Tranquility, twenty-first editions, Tehran: Mizan Publication. (In Persian)

[19] Schneider. Stephen. (2000). organized contraband smuggling and its Enforcement in Canada assessment of the Anti-Smuggling Initiative, Trends in organized crime [electronic resource], volume 6, issue 2.

[20] Shams, Abdullah. (2005). Civil Procedure, Tehran: Drak publication. (In Persian)

[21] Torabi, Mohamad. (1999). Study On Temporary Entry and Its Issues, internal reporting, planning and improving customs office, Tehran: Iranian customs. (In Persian)

[22] Walidi, Muhammad Salih. (2007). Economic criminal law, Tehran: Mizan Publication. (In Persian)