Maryam Abbasi avval; Mansour Amirzadeh jirkoli; mohamad ali saeidi
Abstract
Due to the fundamental inconsistency of some judicial and criminal procedures on social phenomena in Islam and the West, the unique capacity of Islamic jurisprudence in formulating and expanding the legal aspects of phenomena and the need to pay attention to indigenous knowledge, action research and ...
Read More
Due to the fundamental inconsistency of some judicial and criminal procedures on social phenomena in Islam and the West, the unique capacity of Islamic jurisprudence in formulating and expanding the legal aspects of phenomena and the need to pay attention to indigenous knowledge, action research and research, the present study is a systematic effort to Investigating the emerging phenomenon of misleading commercial propaganda and finding a ground for a jurisprudential and indigenous approach to deal with this phenomenon. The results of qualitative meta-analysis of more than two decades of research in this field showed that these advertisements are in four basic misleading dimensions due to information deletion, Misleading due to semantic ambiguity, misleading due to comparison of characteristics, and misleading due to non-fulfillment of claim are realized by different theories in psychology, linguistics, and social sciences. It was also found that the Islamic jurisprudence has both preventive and productive capacities to deal with this phenomenon. Accordingly, a four-step conceptual model of legislation was proposed in the all stages of which the Islamic jurisprudence has theoretical capacities which can be manipulated and used.
abolfazl alishahi ghale googhi; mahdi dehghan
Abstract
The existing laws on cultural heritage treasure, significantly limiting the private ownership of treasure, treasure and historical monuments - culture is seen, including Article 562 of the Penal Code to acquire property that any exploration of the historical - cultural prohibited, and committed to ...
Read More
The existing laws on cultural heritage treasure, significantly limiting the private ownership of treasure, treasure and historical monuments - culture is seen, including Article 562 of the Penal Code to acquire property that any exploration of the historical - cultural prohibited, and committed to prison from six months to three years and sentenced to capture objects artifacts. This question is not legitimate, and ways of legitimizing rests on what basis do they? Is it legal provisions need to be revised to cope with new situations or problems Msthdsh and that existing laws must be reviewed to comply with the law, this ambiguity is resolved? What is the consensus of the Supreme Shiite scholars today and traditions Mtvatrh Ksyrh or get in the door - it is a treasure and will work with the special provisions, and he got it, it should be just the fifth Islamic pay. Focus on the words of the Sunni vote and comment on them as we agreed. Therefore, there is no way for routine recording of treasure recovered from his right to disallow or limit discovery and property do not exist unless one of the aspects mentioned in the text is justified. Study, the appropriate remedy in this regard, the 80-year review of the legislation in this area to clarify the vague boundaries of ownership, and secure ownership is known
