##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

عباس نیازی ایام کمرخانی محسن جلیلیان

چکیده

در این مقاله با محوریت حکم ماده 479 لایحه جدید قانون تجارت در باب شرکت تک شریک و دیدگاه‌های حقوقی، مسئله شرکت تک شریک را مورد بررسی قرار خواهیم داد. سعی شده فلسفه وجودی، معایب، مزایا و احتیاط‌های لازم شرکت تک شریک مورد کاوش قرار گیرد و با بررسی تطبیقی، بایسته‌های پذیرش این نوع شرکت جمع‌آوری شود. باید بدانیم که تأسیس حقوقی شرکتِ تک شریک ممکن است با تأسیسات حقوقی دیگر در ارتباط باشد که بررسی نکردن آن تأسیسات نیل به یک دیدگاه جامع را نامقدور می‌سازد، لذا بررسی مسائل جانبی شرکت‌های تک شریک هم در دستور کار قرارگرفته است. در این مقاله فرض بر این است که با پذیرش شرکت تک شریک منحصر کردن ساختار شرکتی آن به شرکت با مسئولیت محدود صحیح نخواهد بود. در این پژوهش از روش تحلیل منابع کتابخانه‌ای بهره جسته‌ایم و نتیجه آن شد که پذیرش این شرکت در حقوق ایران می‌بایست با اعمال احتیاط‌ها و رفع ابهاماتی همراه باشد و نیاز به رعایت مواردی، ازجمله تحمیل شروط قانونی و تعیین حداقل سرمایه و امکان خرق شخصیت حقوقی شرکت دارد.

جزئیات مقاله

مراجع
[1]Akhavy,A(No Full Name). (1940). Non partner corpoation. Justice ministry of collection law, No. 149, pp. 63-65. (in persian)
[2]Ansari, vali-o-Alah. (2013). Administrative contrasts law. Hoghoughdan publication, second edition. (in persian)
[3]Al-Heidari hiva Ebrahim. (2010). The comparative study of limited one partnership company, Beirout, Halabi law publications. (in arabic)
[16]Beatty, Jeffrey F.& Samuelson, Susan S., Introduction to business law, South-Western, 2010.
[17]Capuano Angelo, The realist’s guide to piercing the corporate veil: Lessons from Hong Kong and Singapore, Australian Journal of Corporate Law,2009. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1369110.
[18]Dine, Janet, Company Law, Palgrave- Mcmillan, 2001.
[19]Directive 2009/102/EC of 16 September 2009 in the area of company law on single-member private limited liability companies.
[20]Enyew, Endalew Lijalem, The Doctrine Of Piercing The Corporate Veil: Its Legal And Judicial Recognirtion In Ethiopia, Mizan Law Review, Vol. 6 No.1, June 2012.
[21]Enyew, Endalew Lijalem, The Doctrine Of Piercing The Corporate Veil: Its Legal And Judicial Recognirtion In Ethiopia, A Thesis Of LLM Degree,Addis Ababa, June 2011.
[22]Eroğlu, Muzaffer, Single-Member Companies in Turkish Law, published in Legal Hukuk Dergisi (Issue 64), (ssrn-id1158421).
[23]Garner, Brayan A. Black Law Dictionary, West Group Publishing, 7ed, 1999.
[8]Isaai Tafreshi, Mohamad. (2007). Analysis of business law firms, Public joint stock company, private joint stock company.Vol 2. Tarbiate Modares of University. (in persian)
[9]Isaai Tafreshi, Mohamad & Amirteimouri, Saeideh. (2013). Single-member commercial companies and historical development, comparative study, comparative law researches. course 17. No. 1. pp. 145-149. (in persian)
[10]Katouzian,N. (2006). Elementary course of civil law, Property and ownership. (fifth edition)Tehran. Mizan publications. (in persian)
[11]Katouzian,N. (2009). Elementary course of civil law, preemption, testament, succession. Mizan publication. (in persian)
[12]Joneidi, Laya & Zare, Malihe. (2015). Applying the rule of piercing from juridical personality on managers, Analysis of responsibilities of the directors holding companies because of unpaid debts of companty, Comparative law studies. Spring & summer 1, course 6, No. 1, pp. 85-105. (in persian)
[13]Mahmoudi, Asghar. (2005). Company formed with a single partner. Faculty of humanities university of Imam Hussein, forteenth year, No.61. (in persian)
[14]Mortaza Shahbazi Nia, Isaai Tafreshi Mohamad, Kaviani Kourosh,Faraghi Esmail. (2011). Crossing of the juridical personality in the case of fraud of partner in legal system of Iran and England. justice law journal, 1996, No.74. summer, pp. 9-39. (in persian)
[15]Nariman Abdolghader. (1992). General rules of limited liability company and single partner, Alghahereh, second edition, Daralnezah Arabiya. (in arabic)
[24]Jianlin, Chen, Clash Of Corporate Personality Theories: A Comparative Study Of One-Member Companies In Singapore And China, Hong Kong LawJournal, Vol 38 Part 2,2008.
[25]Jocić, Dragana Radenkovic, A Single Member Company- Convenient Or Not For The Founders, Facta Universitatis, Economics and Organization, Vol. 2, No 3, 2005.
[26]Katinka, Beretka, Concept Of Single Member Companies In The Light Of EU Harmonization: Comparative Analysis Of Serbia, Germany And UK, LLM Short Thesis, Central European Univercity, 2010.
[27]Mallor, Jane P., et al., Business Law: The Ethical, Global, And E-Commerce Environment, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2010.
[28]Mann, Richard A, & Roberts, Barry S., business law and regulation of business, South-Western, 2011.
[4]Sadeghi,Mohsen.Speeches of economic analysis of law.Faculty of Law and Political Science University of Tehran, M.A. of International Commercial
[5]Safar,MohamadJavad. (2011).legalpersonality,Khorsandypublications,first edition. (in persian)
[6]Safai,Sayyed Hossein & Qasemzadeh,Sayyed Mortaza. (2005). civil law, persons and persons under legal incapacity. Samt publications. (in persian)
[29]Shin, Eun Young, Cho, In Yeung J., Piercing of the Corporate Veil in Korea: Case Commentary Journal of Korean LawVol. 9, No. 1, December 2009.
[7]Tabatabai Motamani,Manouchehr. (2008). administrative law, Samt publication, fifteenth edition. (in persian)
[30]Twelfth Council Company Law Directive 89/667/EEC Of 21 1989 On Single-Member Private Limited Liability Companies.
ارجاع به مقاله
نیازیع., کمرخانیا., & جلیلیانم. (2017). بررسی شرکت تک شریک در حقوق ایران با نگاه تطبیقی. دانشنامه حقوق اقتصادی, 22(8), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.22067/le.v22i8.34314
نوع مقاله
علمی پژوهشی